詮釋資料說明

文件類型

本館出版品

題名

文化的全球在地化、多元現代性與中山思想

題名(英)

Glocalization of culture, multiple modernity and Dr. Sun Yat-sen's Thought

作者

劉久清

期刊

孫學研究

ISSN

1996-265-7

出版頻率

半年刊

出版西元年月日

2013/05/16

卷期

第14期

頁次

P001-041

關鍵詞

文化的全球在地化 、 多元現代性 、 現代 、 反現代 、 中山思想

關鍵詞(英)

glocalization of culture 、 multiple modernity 、 modern 、 anti-modern 、 dr. sun yat-sen's thought

全文內容

　　現代性乃源自西歐北美而席捲全球的巨大社會變遷，中國非但無法自外，更在十九世紀受迫於強勢武力而不得不捲入此一浪潮。於是，廿世紀初，國人開始全面探討因應之道，雖然各種主張言論紛陳，其最基本的關切點端在固有文化如何因應。不幸的是，參與其中的多數人在思考此一問題時，卻陷入二分法的泥淖，以致多次文化論戰，討論重心均在於是否接受全面西化。
　　時隔近百年的今日，因於現代化發展規模的擴充所獲得的經驗資料，與從而發展出來、所以檢討現代性的理論觀點（尤其是後現代）。使我們認知到隨著現代化發展為全球化，而全球化又勢必與在地化互動成為全球在地化，而且是文化的全球在地化，以致於當代在有意識地推動社會變遷時追求的發展，其標的不宜、不應也不可能再是某種獨一無二的現代性，而是多元現代性。
　　有了這樣的認知背景，再回頭檢視百年前對我國社會發展的各種思考，就必須肯認中山先生確有其超邁當時的識見，能不以簡單的二分法思考因應西方強勢文化之道，而以實用為判準，同時檢視我國既有文化與西方文化的典章制度，致力加以接合，也就是要以（雖然當時並不存在的概念）全球在地化的視野發展出中華現代性。

全文內容

　　Modernity, a huge global social change originates from west Europe and North America which China not only could not isolate from it, but was forced by foreign powers to get involved in the nineteenth century. Thereafter, Chinese intellectuals started to seek the comprehensive way to deal with it from the early of the twentieth century. Though there's all kind of opinions, the most basic concern is how the traditional culture of China to respond to it properly. Unfortunately, most people who enquiry this question are trapped in the quagmire of the dichotomy, so that the focus of discussion of every cultural controversy lies in whether to accept the total westernization.
　　Nowadays, almost a hundred years after, from the experience data of large scale modernize development, on which we use to develop and review the theoretical perspectives of modernity (especially postmodernism), we recognize that along with the development of modernization to globalization, the globalization is bound to interact with localization to become glocalization, and is bound to be glocalization of culture. Consequently, for the pursuit of development in contemporary when we are consciously promoting the social change, its target should not, ought not and wouldn’t be possible to be certain unique modernity, but multiple modernity.
　　With such cognitive background to trace back and review all those thinking about Chinese social development hundred years ago, one must admit and recognize that Dr. Sun Yat-sen did have his exceeding insight not to simply reflect the challenge of modern situation with dichotomy. Instead he used pragmatism as criteria to check institutions and regularities of both western culture and ours, and tried to integrate them to develop Chinese modernity from the vision of glocalization.

出版者

國立國父紀念館

出版地

臺北市

備註

GPN:2009503228